Post by account_disabled on Dec 24, 2023 3:36:16 GMT
Athe role of the Land Register entry is what information you can find there and how you can access that information. RoxanaParaschiva Sseac December CCR decision . Review in CPP discriminatory limitation CASE LAW National jurisprudence Criminal procedure minutes Alexandra Enachescu May Decision number Decision no. Keywords Unconstitutionality review appeal equal rights free access to justice fair trial right to defense discrimination acquittal The author of the notification Bucharest District Court Criminal Section.
The object of the notification The exception of unconstitutionality of the Country Email List provisions of art. paragraph and first sentence and of art. paragraph of the Code of Criminal Procedure Reason for notification It is argued in essence that the criticized provisions of the law which do not allow the invocation of the review case provided for by art. paragraph letter a of the Code of Criminal Procedure violate the constitutional provisions of art. par. according to which No one is above the law of art. par. regarding the right to a fair trial and of art. regarding the right to defense as well as the provisions of art.
Paragraph regarding the right to a fair trial and art. regarding the prohibition of discrimination in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of art. on equality before the law d in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and of art. paragraph on the right to a fair trial of the International Covenant on exclude the possibility of the victim of a judicial error which had the capacity of civil party to request and obtain the pronouncement of a legal and thorough solution in the case respectively the conviction of the defendant. Since the criticized provisions of the law do not allow.
The object of the notification The exception of unconstitutionality of the Country Email List provisions of art. paragraph and first sentence and of art. paragraph of the Code of Criminal Procedure Reason for notification It is argued in essence that the criticized provisions of the law which do not allow the invocation of the review case provided for by art. paragraph letter a of the Code of Criminal Procedure violate the constitutional provisions of art. par. according to which No one is above the law of art. par. regarding the right to a fair trial and of art. regarding the right to defense as well as the provisions of art.
Paragraph regarding the right to a fair trial and art. regarding the prohibition of discrimination in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of art. on equality before the law d in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and of art. paragraph on the right to a fair trial of the International Covenant on exclude the possibility of the victim of a judicial error which had the capacity of civil party to request and obtain the pronouncement of a legal and thorough solution in the case respectively the conviction of the defendant. Since the criticized provisions of the law do not allow.